June 2004 - Posts

• Provider Conclusion

  This will be my last post about the provider issue. I've worked out a couple of solutions and for a while I was keen on moving to a provider command object. The only problem with a command object is that properly implement you have to change the way the Read More... Posted Wednesday, June 30, 2004 1:11 AM by pmurphy | 6 Comments

• Express Products, Visual Studio Beta 1

  I've been waiting for this day for a while. http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/vs2005/ Share this post: email it! | bookmark it! | digg it! | reddit! | kick it! | live it! Sponsor Read More... Posted Tuesday, June 29, 2004 3:40 PM by pmurphy | 0 Comments

• I don't know how I missed this... get it?

  Microsoft Solutions for Internet Business 2.5 It's a few months old, but it's new to me. I played with MSIB 1.0 and it was nice. I didn't have any respect for the Content Management Server 2000 product when I got done toying around. The product was very Read More... Posted Monday, June 28, 2004 9:26 PM by pmurphy | 0 Comments

• sidebar

  I write a set on non supported managed wrappers for this MTA . This is hands down the best high performance MTA on the market. Nothing can compete with it. Anyways, they sent me a new beta yesterday that I started working on which kept me away from this. Read More... Posted Wednesday, June 16, 2004 12:33 PM by pmurphy | 0 Comments

• Provider Plumbing

  Ok. So in the last post I wrote about how to implement a configuration section for a provider. For the sake of consistency, I’m going to repost that code. I’ve also implemented the plumbing of a typical provider implementation. In case you Read More... Posted Monday, June 14, 2004 1:49 PM by pmurphy | 0 Comments

• Configuration

  I’ve decided to take some time and get started on unraveling this whole provider thing. To understand the problem in the provider design pattern you have to first understand how to implement a provider. There are a lot of base classes to assist Read More... Posted Friday, June 04, 2004 1:57 PM by pmurphy | 0 Comments

• Database Naming Schemas

  http://weblogs.asp.net/jamauss/articles/DatabaseNamingConventions.aspx This is just fascinating. A very well written article. I would suggest that rule 1f been modified to include an x between the two table names. Share this post: email it! | bookmark Read More... Posted Tuesday, June 01, 2004 2:56 PM by pmurphy | 0 Comments